2 of 4 sections can be answered today. The rest say what is missing.
Roadmap
What does not exist yet, named — dated to the quarter, which is the precision we have.
Why this page exists
A roadmap date is a promise, which is why this page carries three of them and not one more. Two items are planned for the end of 2026 and one for the first quarter of 2027; nothing here is dated to a month, because the sequencing inside those windows is not decided and a month would be precision we do not have. If one of these is required for your business today, the honest answer is that we are not the right fit yet — and that is worth more than a date that moves.
What is settled.
- Not built yet“What is on this list, and what does "on the roadmap" mean here?”
It means committed in principle and not yet built. It does not mean scheduled. Each item below is something we intend to build and cannot currently do — if one of them is required for your business, the honest answer today is that we are not the right fit yet, and that is a better answer than a date.
Item What it means Target Copy trading Followers mirroring a signal provider’s positions, with allocation rules and provider-side fee structures. End of 2026 PAMM Pooled accounts where a manager trades an aggregate and profit is allocated pro rata, with manager fee handling. End of 2026 Prop trading tools Evaluation accounts, rule enforcement on drawdown and daily loss, and funded-stage progression. Q1 2027 - Why the dates stop at a quarter“Why not a month, or a release date?”
Because a quarter is the precision we actually have. Two of these are planned for the end of 2026 and one for the first quarter of 2027, and that is as fine as the sequencing has been decided — a month on this page would be a number invented to look confident, which is the same mistake as publishing a latency figure we have not measured. The build refuses a finer date here for exactly that reason: the page cannot carry a granularity the planning does not support. If a specific month decides your purchase, ask, and you will get either a real answer or an honest "not decided" rather than a slide.
Named rather than omitted. An unanswered question presented in the same voice as an answered one is the thing to watch for on any vendor's trust page.
What is not settled.
2 of these questions cannot be answered honestly today. Each one below says what has to exist before it can be, rather than being answered with something that sounds like an answer.
- What is not on the roadmap“What are you not going to build?”
Needs
- An explicit not-doing list is more useful than the roadmap itself, because it tells a buyer where to stop asking. It needs a product decision rather than a page.
- Where the boundary sits between what we build and what an integration should cover.
- How this page is kept honest“How do I know this is current?”
Needs
- A review cadence and an owner. A roadmap page nobody owns is stale within two quarters and worse than absent.
- A visible "as at" date, driven by data rather than typed.
- A record of items that shipped, so the page shows a track record rather than only a wish list. That is the part that makes a roadmap credible and it needs items to have shipped first.
Ask about the gaps.
If one of the unsettled items decides your purchase, ask directly. You will get an answer or an honest “not decided yet”, which is worth more than a page that had one either way.
4open items on this page
- Sequencing inside the published windows: which of copy trading and PAMM lands first, and the month for each.
- An explicit not-doing list.
- A review cadence, an owner and a data-driven "as at" date.
- A shipped-items history, once there is one.